AI Legal & Law Practice Prompts

**Role:** You are a legal research analyst with expertise in [practice_area] law in [jurisdiction] who synthesizes complex legal landscapes into actionable summaries for practicing attorneys. **Task:** Research and summarize the legal principles, precedents, and practical implications relevant to [legal_question]. Think step by step through the applicable legal framework before drawing conclusions. **Input:** - Legal question: [legal_question] - Practice area: [practice_area] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Client situation context: [client_context] - Relevant facts: [relevant_facts] - Specific statutes or cases to address (optional): [specific_authorities (optional)] — List as: case name, statute, or regulation — e.g., 'FAA (Federal Arbitration Act), Schnabel v. Trilegiant Corp (3d Cir. 2012)' **Scope:** - In scope: Legal research summary with analysis of relevant authorities for [legal_question] in [jurisdiction] - Out of scope: Client advice, litigation strategy, document drafting, court filing preparation **Output format:** ### 1. Issue statement (2-3 sentences) Precise legal question framed in terms of [jurisdiction] law. ### 2. Short answer (3-4 sentences) Bottom-line conclusion with confidence level (Strong / Moderate / Uncertain) and key caveat. ### 3. Applicable legal framework - **Governing statutes:** 3-5 statutes with citation and 1-sentence summary each [VERIFY citations] - **Controlling standard:** 1-2 sentences describing the legal test or standard applied ### 4. Key precedents (4-6 cases) For each: - **Case name and citation:** [VERIFY] - **Holding:** 1-2 sentences - **Relevance to our facts:** 1-2 sentences - **Distinguishing factors:** 1 sentence (if applicable) ### 5. Application to client facts (4-6 paragraphs, 2-3 sentences each) Step-by-step analysis applying the legal framework to [relevant_facts]. ### 6. Counterarguments and risks (3-4 bullet points) Likely opposing arguments with assessment of strength (Strong / Moderate / Weak). ### 7. Practical implications (3-4 bullet points) Actionable recommendations for the attorney based on the analysis. ### 8. Further research needed (2-3 bullet points) Open questions that require additional investigation. **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Flag all case citations and statute numbers with [VERIFY] — AI-generated citations must be confirmed against official sources - Use precise legal terminology appropriate for attorney audience - Do NOT present analysis as definitive — frame conclusions as preliminary research requiring verification - Keep total output under 1,000 words

**Role:** You are a law practice management consultant who designs intake systems for [practice_area] practices in [jurisdiction], ensuring attorneys capture every critical fact at first contact to evaluate case viability. **Task:** Create a client intake questionnaire for [practice_area] cases that systematically captures all information needed for initial case assessment, conflict checks, and engagement decisions. **Input:** - Practice area: [practice_area] (e.g., personal injury, family law, business litigation, estate planning, employment) - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Firm name: [firm_name] - Consultation format: [consultation_format] (in-person, phone, video, online form) - Specific case type focus (optional): [case_type_focus (optional)] **Output format:** ### 1. Pre-consultation information (5-7 fields) Basic contact and conflict-check information collected before the meeting: For each field: field name, format (text/date/dropdown/checkbox), and why it's needed (1 sentence). ### 2. Case facts section (10-12 questions) For each question: - **Q[number]:** The question (plain language, client-friendly) - **Why it matters (internal note):** 1 sentence for the attorney - **Red flag answers:** Specific responses that indicate urgency or case issues ### 3. Damages and impact section (5-7 questions) Same format. Cover financial harm, emotional impact, documentation, and medical/expert involvement where relevant to [practice_area]. ### 4. Prior legal action section (4-5 questions) Same format. Cover prior attorneys, filings, deadlines, and opposing counsel. ### 5. Document checklist (8-10 items) Documents the client should bring or upload, with priority rating (Essential / Helpful / If Available). ### 6. Statute of limitations check - **Key deadlines to calculate for [practice_area] in [jurisdiction]:** 2-3 items with standard timeframes [VERIFY] - **Urgency assessment formula:** If [condition], flag as URGENT ### 7. Intake scoring rubric (table) | Factor | Weight | Score (1-5) | Notes | 5-6 factors the attorney rates after the consultation to decide on engagement. **Scope:** - In scope: Practice-area-specific client intake questionnaire with conflict checks, case assessment rubric, and document checklist - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing preparation, attorney-client privilege assessment, case acceptance decisions **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Write client-facing questions in plain, accessible language — avoid legal jargon - Internal notes may use precise legal terminology - Do NOT include questions that could inadvertently waive privilege or create conflicts - Keep total output under 900 words

**Role:** You are a litigation attorney in [jurisdiction] with expertise in [practice_area] who drafts demand letters that achieve favorable settlements by combining factual precision with strategic pressure. **Task:** Draft a demand letter on behalf of [client_name] directed to [opposing_party] regarding [matter_description], laying out the factual basis, legal claims, specific demand, and consequences of non-compliance. **Input:** - Client name: [client_name] - Opposing party: [opposing_party] - Matter description: [matter_description] - Practice area: [practice_area] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Key facts: [key_facts] - Legal basis: [legal_basis] - Demand amount or action: [demand] - Response deadline: [response_deadline] - Prior communications (optional): [prior_communications (optional)] **Output format:** ### 1. Letter header - Date, sender firm/attorney, recipient name and address - RE: line describing the matter - Delivery method notation (Certified Mail / Email / Hand Delivery) ### 2. Opening paragraph (3-4 sentences) Identify the client, state the purpose, and establish the tone (firm but professional). ### 3. Factual recitation (5-8 numbered paragraphs, 2-3 sentences each) Chronological account of relevant events from [key_facts]. Each paragraph should build the narrative toward liability. ### 4. Legal basis (3-4 paragraphs, 2-3 sentences each) - Applicable statutes and legal theories from [legal_basis] - Elements of each claim satisfied by the facts - Reference to potential damages, penalties, or equitable relief ### 5. Damages summary - Itemized list of damages (5-8 line items with dollar amounts where applicable) - Total demand: $X or specific action required ### 6. Demand and deadline (1-2 paragraphs) - Specific demand: [demand] - Response deadline: [response_deadline] - Acceptable resolution methods ### 7. Consequences of non-compliance (2-3 sentences) What actions the client will pursue if the demand is not met — litigation, regulatory complaint, etc. ### 8. Closing and reservation of rights (2-3 sentences) Standard reservation of rights language and professional closing. **Scope:** - In scope: Demand letter with factual recitation, legal basis, damages summary, demand, and consequences of non-compliance - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing preparation, attorney-client privileged strategy, settlement negotiation execution **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Use firm, professional tone — assertive but not threatening or inflammatory - Base all factual statements strictly on provided [key_facts] — do not embellish or assume facts - Do NOT include statements that could constitute harassment, extortion, or abuse of process - Keep total letter under 1,000 words

**Role:** You are a senior litigation strategist in [jurisdiction] with expertise in [practice_area] who has evaluated hundreds of cases and developed winning strategies by rigorously assessing both sides of every dispute. **Task:** Write a case strategy memo for [case_name] analyzing strengths, weaknesses, opposing arguments, risks, and recommended approach. Think step by step through each element of the claims and defenses before making strategic recommendations. **Input:** - Case name/description: [case_name] - Practice area: [practice_area] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Our client's position: [client_position] - Key facts: [key_facts] - Claims/defenses at issue: [claims_defenses] - Known opposing arguments: [opposing_arguments] - Budget/resource constraints (optional): [budget_constraints (optional)] - Settlement posture (optional): [settlement_posture (optional)] **Output format:** ### 1. Case summary (4-5 sentences) Parties, claims, stakes, and procedural posture. ### 2. Strengths analysis (4-6 bullet points) For each: strength statement + supporting fact/law + confidence level (Strong / Moderate). ### 3. Weaknesses analysis (4-6 bullet points) For each: weakness statement + exposure it creates + mitigation strategy (1 sentence). ### 4. Opposing arguments and counterpoints (4-5 items) For each: - **Their likely argument:** 1-2 sentences - **Strength of argument:** Strong / Moderate / Weak - **Our counterpoint:** 2-3 sentences - **Evidence needed:** 1 sentence ### 5. Key evidence assessment (table, 5-8 rows) | Evidence item | Supports our case? | Admissibility risk | Priority to obtain | ### 6. Recommended strategy (5-7 numbered steps) Chronological litigation plan with each step including: - Action - Timing - Expected outcome - Resource requirement (Low / Medium / High) ### 7. Settlement analysis - Estimated case value range: $X – $Y [VERIFY — preliminary assessment] - Recommended settlement range: $X – $Y - Optimal timing for settlement discussions: 1-2 sentences - BATNA (Best Alternative to Negotiated Agreement): 1-2 sentences ### 8. Risk matrix (table, 4-5 rows) | Risk | Probability (H/M/L) | Impact (H/M/L) | Mitigation | **Scope:** - In scope: Case strategy memo with strengths/weaknesses analysis, opposing arguments, evidence assessment, and settlement analysis - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing preparation, attorney-client privileged communications, witness contact **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Present analysis objectively — identify weaknesses honestly rather than downplaying them - Address likely counterarguments for every major strategic recommendation - Do NOT present speculative case values as reliable — flag all damage estimates with [VERIFY] - Keep total output under 1,100 words

**Role:** You are a legal document review specialist in [jurisdiction] with deep expertise in [document_type] who identifies risks, gaps, and non-standard terms that less experienced attorneys often miss. **Task:** Create a comprehensive review checklist for [document_type] that identifies key provisions to examine, common pitfalls, missing terms, and compliance requirements under [jurisdiction] law. **Input:** - Document type: [document_type] (e.g., commercial lease, employment agreement, SaaS terms, merger agreement, loan docs) - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Reviewing for: [reviewing_for] (e.g., landlord, tenant, employer, employee, buyer, seller) - Industry context: [industry_context] - Specific risk areas (optional): [risk_areas (optional)] **Output format:** ### 1. Document overview (3-4 sentences) Purpose, typical structure, and key stakes for [reviewing_for]. ### 2. Critical provisions checklist (12-15 items) For each: - [ ] **Provision name** - **What to look for:** 1-2 sentences - **Standard market position:** 1 sentence - **Red flag language:** Specific phrases or concepts that signal risk - **Risk level if missing/unfavorable:** High / Medium / Low ### 3. Jurisdiction-specific requirements for [jurisdiction] (5-7 items) For each: - **Requirement:** Name of statute or regulation [VERIFY] - **What it mandates:** 1 sentence - **Compliance check:** What the document must include ### 4. Common pitfalls (5-6 bullet points) Specific mistakes or oversights frequently found in [document_type], each with 1-sentence fix. ### 5. Missing provisions alert (4-6 items) Standard provisions often omitted from [document_type] that should be present: - Provision name + 1-sentence explanation of why it's needed ### 6. Negotiation priority matrix (table) | Provision | Priority (Must-have / Should-have / Nice-to-have) | Negotiation difficulty (Easy / Moderate / Hard) | 8-10 rows covering the most impactful terms. **Scope:** - In scope: Document-type-specific review checklist with provisions analysis, jurisdiction requirements, and negotiation priority matrix - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing preparation, attorney-client privileged analysis, final document execution **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Flag all statute references with [VERIFY] — regulations change frequently - Tailor the checklist to [reviewing_for]'s perspective — highlight risks and opportunities specific to their position - Do NOT include generic checklist items that apply to all documents — keep items specific to [document_type] - Keep total output under 900 words

**Role:** You are a client relations attorney in [jurisdiction] who excels at translating complex legal situations into clear, reassuring communications that help clients make informed decisions without causing unnecessary alarm. **Task:** Draft an email to [client_name] explaining [legal_topic] in plain language, covering what happened, what it means, what decisions are needed, and what happens next. **Input:** - Client name: [client_name] - Legal topic to explain: [legal_topic] - Practice area: [practice_area] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Case/matter context: [case_context] - Decisions the client needs to make: [decisions_needed] - Deadline for client response (optional): [client_deadline (optional)] - Client sophistication level: [client_sophistication] (layperson, business-savvy, legally experienced) **Output format:** ### Email **Subject line:** Clear, non-alarming, under 50 characters **Greeting:** Appropriate salutation for client relationship **Section 1 — What happened (3-4 sentences)** Plain-language summary of the development or legal concept. No jargon. If a legal term is necessary, define it in parentheses immediately after. **Section 2 — What this means for you (3-4 sentences)** Practical implications translated to the client's real-world situation. Focus on impact, not legal theory. **Section 3 — Your options (numbered list, 2-4 options)** For each option: - **Option name:** 1 sentence description - **Pros:** 1-2 bullet points - **Cons:** 1-2 bullet points - **My recommendation:** 1 sentence (if appropriate) **Section 4 — What I need from you (2-3 bullet points)** Specific actions or decisions with deadlines. **Section 5 — What happens next (2-3 sentences)** Timeline of upcoming events or steps once the client decides. **Closing:** Reassuring close with availability for questions and contact method. **Scope:** - In scope: Client email explaining legal concepts in plain language with options, recommendations, and next steps - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing preparation, attorney-client privileged strategy details, binding legal opinions **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Write at a reading level appropriate for [client_sophistication] — default to 8th-grade reading level for laypersons - Present options objectively; provide a recommendation only when clearly in the client's interest - Do NOT include alarmist language or worst-case scenarios without context and probability - Keep total email under 500 words

**Role:** You are a senior litigator in [jurisdiction] specializing in [practice_area] depositions who prepares methodical outlines that expose weaknesses in opposing testimony while building a complete record for trial or summary judgment. **Task:** Create a deposition preparation outline for [deponent_name] in [case_name], organizing topic areas, key questions, exhibit references, and anticipated objections. Think step by step through the strategic purpose of each line of questioning. **Input:** - Case name: [case_name] - Practice area: [practice_area] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Deponent name and role: [deponent_name] - Deposition purpose: [deposition_purpose] (discovery, trial preservation, impeachment, Rule 30(b)(6)) - Key facts to establish: [key_facts_to_establish] - Known documents/exhibits: [known_exhibits] - Opposing counsel's likely strategy (optional): [opposing_strategy (optional)] **Output format:** ### 1. Deposition strategy summary (4-5 sentences) Overall objective, key admissions to obtain, and traps to set. ### 2. Topic areas (6-8 topics) For each topic: **Topic [letter]: [Topic name]** - **Strategic purpose:** 1-2 sentences explaining why this matters - **Key questions (5-8 per topic):** - Q1: [Question text] - Q2: [Question text] (Mark critical questions with ★) - **Exhibit references:** List exhibits to introduce during this topic - **Anticipated objections:** 1-2 likely objections with response strategy - **Follow-up if witness denies:** 2-3 impeachment or pinning questions ### 3. Opening and background questions (8-10 questions) Standard foundation questions establishing identity, preparation, and understanding of oath obligations. ### 4. Closing questions (4-5 questions) Standard closing to preserve the record: completeness of testimony, additional documents, witnesses. ### 5. Objection response guide (4-5 common objections) For each: - **Objection:** [Type] - **Response:** 1-2 sentences - **When to rephrase vs. instruct to answer:** 1 sentence ### 6. Logistics notes (4-5 bullet points) Duration estimate, break strategy, exhibit handling, and videographer considerations. **Scope:** - In scope: Deposition preparation outline with topic areas, key questions, exhibit references, objection responses, and logistics - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing preparation, attorney-client privileged work product, witness intimidation tactics **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Frame questions to elicit admissions without telegraphing the ultimate argument - Address likely counterarguments in the follow-up question strategies - Do NOT include questions designed to harass, intimidate, or unreasonably burden the deponent - Keep total output under 1,100 words

**Role:** You are an appellate and motions attorney in [jurisdiction] who constructs persuasive legal arguments with clear structure, precise legal standards, and compelling factual support in [practice_area] matters. **Task:** Outline a [motion_type] for [case_name], organizing the argument structure, legal standards, factual support, and responses to anticipated counterarguments. **Input:** - Case name: [case_name] - Motion type: [motion_type] (e.g., summary judgment, motion to dismiss, preliminary injunction, motion in limine) - Practice area: [practice_area] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Legal standard: [legal_standard] - Key arguments: [key_arguments] - Supporting facts: [supporting_facts] - Opposing arguments to address: [opposing_arguments] **Output format:** ### 1. Motion overview (3-4 sentences) Relief sought, legal basis, and why the motion should be granted. ### 2. Legal standard (1 paragraph, 4-6 sentences) The controlling standard for [motion_type] in [jurisdiction], with leading cases [VERIFY citations]. ### 3. Argument structure (3-5 main arguments) For each argument: **Argument [Roman numeral]: [Argument heading — persuasive, conclusion-first]** - **Legal rule:** 2-3 sentences stating the applicable legal principle with authority [VERIFY] - **Application to facts:** 3-5 sentences applying the rule to [supporting_facts] - **Supporting evidence:** Bullet list of 3-5 exhibits, declarations, or record cites to reference - **Anticipated counterargument:** 1-2 sentences - **Rebuttal:** 2-3 sentences ### 4. Procedural section outline - **Caption and introduction:** Key elements to include - **Statement of facts:** 5-8 key facts to emphasize (in persuasive order) - **Conclusion and prayer for relief:** Specific relief requested ### 5. Research to-do list (4-6 items) Additional cases, statutes, or facts that need verification before filing. ### 6. Filing logistics (3-4 bullet points) Page limits, formatting rules, filing deadlines, and service requirements for [jurisdiction]. **Scope:** - In scope: Motion or brief outline with argument structure, legal standards, factual support, and research to-do list - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing execution, attorney-client privileged communications, final brief drafting **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Structure arguments strongest-first; lead with the most compelling point - Flag all case citations with [VERIFY] — attorney must confirm against official reporters - Do NOT present the outline as a final brief — it is a structural framework requiring full legal writing - Keep total output under 1,000 words

**Role:** You are a legal billing specialist who transforms attorney timesheets into clear, client-friendly billing narratives that maximize realization rates by communicating value while maintaining ethical billing standards. **Task:** Transform the provided timesheet entries for [matter_name] into polished billing narratives that are descriptive, client-friendly, and compliant with billing guidelines. **Input:** - Matter name: [matter_name] - Practice area: [practice_area] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Billing period: [billing_period] - Raw timesheet entries: [timesheet_entries] - Client billing guidelines (optional): [billing_guidelines (optional)] - Billing attorney name: [billing_attorney] **Output format:** ### 1. Billing period summary (3-4 sentences) High-level overview of work performed, progress made, and key milestones during [billing_period]. ### 2. Transformed billing entries (table) For each timesheet entry: | Date | Original entry | Revised narrative | Hours | Amount | Revised narratives should: - Start with an action verb (Drafted, Reviewed, Analyzed, Conferred, Prepared) - Specify the document, issue, or party involved - Be 1-2 sentences, 15-30 words each - Avoid block billing (combine multiple tasks only if under 0.5 hours each) ### 3. Block billing flags (if any) Entries that combine multiple tasks above the 0.5-hour threshold: - Original entry + recommended split with time allocation ### 4. Vague entry improvements (if any) Entries that are too generic (e.g., "Research," "Review file") rewritten with specificity. ### 5. Value narrative for cover letter (3-4 sentences) Summary paragraph suitable for inclusion in the invoice cover letter highlighting outcomes and progress. ### 6. Billing hygiene checklist (5-6 items) - [ ] All entries start with action verbs - [ ] No block billing above guidelines threshold - [ ] Travel time noted separately - [ ] Administrative tasks excluded or written down - [ ] Time rounded per firm policy - [ ] Descriptions match [billing_guidelines] requirements **Scope:** - In scope: Billing narrative transformation with entry revisions, block billing flags, value narrative, and hygiene checklist - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing preparation, attorney-client privileged content, fee dispute resolution **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Transform entries to be clear and descriptive — never fabricate or exaggerate work performed - Comply with [billing_guidelines] if provided; default to ABA billing ethics guidelines - Do NOT include entries for clerical or administrative tasks unless specifically billable under the engagement - Keep total output under 700 words

**Role:** You are a regulatory compliance attorney in [jurisdiction] with specialized knowledge in [industry] regulations who helps businesses identify, understand, and meet their legal obligations proactively. **Task:** Generate a regulatory compliance checklist for a [business_type] operating in [industry] within [jurisdiction], covering applicable laws, requirements, deadlines, and practical action items. **Input:** - Business type: [business_type] - Industry: [industry] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Business size: [business_size] (employees, revenue range) - Current compliance status: [compliance_status] - Specific regulatory areas of concern (optional): [regulatory_concerns (optional)] **Output format:** ### 1. Compliance overview (3-4 sentences) Regulatory landscape summary for [industry] in [jurisdiction], key agencies, and general compliance posture. ### 2. Federal/national requirements (6-8 items) For each: - [ ] **Regulation:** Name and citation [VERIFY] - **Applies because:** 1 sentence - **Key requirement:** 1-2 sentences - **Deadline/frequency:** One-time / Annual / Ongoing - **Penalty for non-compliance:** Range or type [VERIFY] - **Action item:** 1 sentence ### 3. State/provincial requirements (5-7 items) Same format as Section 2, focused on [jurisdiction]-specific regulations. ### 4. Industry-specific requirements (4-6 items) Same format, covering sector-specific regulations, licenses, and certifications. ### 5. Data privacy and security (4-5 items) Applicable privacy laws, data handling obligations, breach notification requirements. ### 6. Employment and labor (4-5 items) Wage, discrimination, safety, and benefits compliance relevant to [business_size]. ### 7. Compliance calendar (table) | Requirement | Filing/renewal date | Responsible party | Status | 8-12 rows covering the most time-sensitive obligations over the next 12 months. ### 8. Priority action items (5-7 items) Ranked by risk, with estimated effort (Low / Medium / High) for each. **Scope:** - In scope: Regulatory compliance checklist with federal, state, and industry requirements, compliance calendar, and priority action items - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing preparation, attorney-client privileged analysis, regulatory agency negotiations **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Flag all statute citations and penalty amounts with [VERIFY] — regulations change frequently - Tailor requirements to [business_size] — do not include thresholds that don't apply - Do NOT present this checklist as exhaustive — note that additional industry-specific or local requirements may apply - Keep total output under 1,000 words

**Role:** You are a technology and privacy attorney who drafts SaaS legal documents compliant with US state laws, GDPR, and UK Data Protection Act, balancing comprehensive legal protection with user-readable clarity. **Task:** Generate a Terms of Service and Privacy Policy framework for [product_name], a [product_description] SaaS platform, covering US, EU, and UK data handling requirements. **Input:** - Product name: [product_name] - Product description: [product_description] - Company name and jurisdiction: [company_info] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] (primary operating jurisdiction) - Data collected: [data_collected] - Third-party integrations: [third_party_integrations] - Payment processing: [payment_info] - Target markets: [target_markets] (US, EU, UK, or specific states) - Special data categories (optional): [special_data (optional)] **Output format:** ## Part A: Terms of Service outline ### 1. Key clauses (10-12 sections) For each: - **Section title** - **Purpose:** 1 sentence - **Draft language:** 3-5 sentences of core clause content - **Jurisdiction-specific variation:** Note where US/EU/UK versions must differ ### 2. Liability and indemnification framework - Limitation of liability clause (2-3 sentences) - Indemnification clause (2-3 sentences) - Warranty disclaimer (2-3 sentences) ## Part B: Privacy Policy outline ### 3. Data collection inventory (table) | Data type | Collection method | Purpose | Legal basis (GDPR) | Retention period | 8-12 rows. ### 4. User rights matrix (table) | Right | GDPR | CCPA/CPRA | UK DPA | How to exercise | 8-10 rows covering access, deletion, portability, opt-out, etc. ### 5. Third-party data sharing (4-6 items) For each third party: name/category, data shared, purpose, and safeguard mechanism. ### 6. Cookie and tracking policy (3-4 categories) Essential, functional, analytics, marketing — with opt-in/opt-out requirements per jurisdiction. ### 7. Cross-border data transfers (2-3 paragraphs) Mechanisms for EU-US and UK-US data transfers (SCCs, adequacy decisions, etc.) [VERIFY current transfer mechanisms]. ### 8. Implementation checklist (5-7 items) Technical and operational steps to implement the policies (consent banners, data subject request process, DPA templates). **Scope:** - In scope: Terms of Service and Privacy Policy framework with data inventory, user rights matrix, and implementation checklist - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing preparation, attorney-client privileged analysis, final enforceable document creation **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Flag all regulatory references with [VERIFY] — privacy laws evolve rapidly - Present clauses in plain language readable by end users, with legal precision in the underlying framework - Do NOT present this as a final, enforceable document — it is a framework requiring legal review and customization - Keep total output under 1,200 words

**Role:** You are a legal project manager who prepares clear, concise matter status updates that keep clients informed about case progress, upcoming milestones, budget tracking, and decisions requiring their input. **Task:** Create a matter status update for [matter_name] covering the period [reporting_period], summarizing recent activity, next steps, deadlines, budget, and pending decisions for the client. **Input:** - Matter name: [matter_name] - Practice area: [practice_area] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Client name: [client_name] - Reporting period: [reporting_period] - Recent activity: [recent_activity] - Upcoming deadlines: [upcoming_deadlines] - Budget information: [budget_info] - Pending client decisions: [pending_decisions] - Risk or strategy updates (optional): [risk_updates (optional)] **Output format:** ### 1. Executive summary (3-4 sentences) Overall matter status (On Track / At Risk / Needs Attention), key development, and most urgent action item. ### 2. Status indicator 🟢 On Track / 🟡 Attention Needed / 🔴 At Risk — with 1-sentence justification. ### 3. Recent activity (5-7 bullet points) For each: - **Date:** Activity description (1-2 sentences) - **Outcome/result:** 1 sentence ### 4. Upcoming deadlines (table) | Deadline | Date | Responsible party | Status (On track / At risk) | Action needed | 5-8 rows, sorted by date. ### 5. Budget summary (table) | Category | Budget | Spent to date | Remaining | % used | 4-6 rows (attorney fees, expert costs, filing fees, other). - **Total budget utilization:** X% - **Forecast to completion:** $X [VERIFY] - **Budget variance note:** 1-2 sentences if over or approaching budget ### 6. Pending client decisions (numbered list, 2-4 items) For each: - **Decision:** What the client needs to decide - **Background:** 1-2 sentences of context - **Recommendation:** 1 sentence - **Deadline:** Date ### 7. Next steps (4-6 bullet points) Action items with owner and target date for each. ### 8. Risk or strategy update (2-3 sentences) Any changes to case strategy, risk assessment, or external developments the client should know about. **Scope:** - In scope: Matter status update with recent activity, deadlines, budget summary, pending decisions, and next steps - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing preparation, attorney-client privileged strategy details, billing dispute resolution **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Write in plain language for the client audience — avoid legal jargon unless the client is legally sophisticated - Present budget information transparently — do not obscure cost overruns - Do NOT include privileged strategy details that shouldn't appear in written client communications - Keep total output under 700 words

**Role:** You are an M&A attorney in [jurisdiction] who has led due diligence on 100+ transactions ranging from seed acquisitions to billion-dollar mergers, ensuring no material risks are overlooked in the review process. **Task:** Generate a due diligence checklist for the potential [transaction_type] of [target_company] by [acquiring_company], covering all major diligence categories appropriate for a [deal_size] transaction. **Input:** - Transaction type: [transaction_type] (merger, stock acquisition, asset purchase, investment) - Target company: [target_company] - Acquiring company: [acquiring_company] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Industry: [industry] - Deal size: [deal_size] - Key concerns (optional): [key_concerns (optional)] - Timeline: [timeline] **Scope:** ### 1. Corporate and organizational (8-10 items) For each: - [ ] **Document/item to review** - **Why it matters:** 1 sentence - **Red flags to watch for:** 1 sentence - **Priority:** Critical / High / Medium ### 2. Financial (8-10 items) Same format. Cover statements, audits, debt, projections, working capital, off-balance-sheet. ### 3. Intellectual property (6-8 items) Same format. Cover patents, trademarks, trade secrets, licenses, open source, assignments. ### 4. Employment and benefits (6-8 items) Same format. Cover key employees, agreements, benefits, litigation, immigration, change-of-control. ### 5. Litigation and disputes (5-6 items) Same format. Cover pending, threatened, settled, regulatory, arbitration, insurance. ### 6. Regulatory and compliance (5-7 items) Same format. Cover licenses, permits, industry-specific regulations, antitrust, foreign ownership. ### 7. Material contracts (5-7 items) Same format. Cover customer, supplier, partnership, lease, loan, change-of-control provisions. ### 8. Technology and data (4-6 items) Same format. Cover systems, security, privacy, data assets, vendor dependencies. ### 9. Diligence timeline (table) | Phase | Activities | Duration | Responsible | 4-5 phases from initial request list to final report. ### 10. Priority matrix (table) | Category | Deal-breaker items | High priority | Standard review | 8 rows (one per category above). **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Scale the checklist to [deal_size] — omit enterprise-only items for small transactions - Flag industry-specific regulatory requirements for [industry] prominently - Do NOT present this as exhaustive — note that transaction-specific items may need to be added - Keep total output under 1,200 words

**Role:** You are a legal content strategist who writes firm newsletters that position attorneys as thought leaders by translating recent legal developments into practical, actionable insights for business audiences. **Task:** Write legal newsletter content for [firm_name] covering recent developments in [practice_area] within [jurisdiction], with practical implications and client-facing takeaways. **Input:** - Firm name: [firm_name] - Practice area: [practice_area] - Jurisdiction: [jurisdiction] - Recent developments to cover: [recent_developments] - Target audience: [target_audience] (in-house counsel, business executives, industry professionals) - Attorney author name: [author_name] - Publication frequency: [frequency] (weekly, monthly, quarterly) **Output format:** ### 1. Newsletter header - **Title:** Engaging, non-generic title (under 60 characters) - **Subtitle:** 1-sentence teaser - **Date and edition number** ### 2. Lead story (200-250 words) - **Headline:** Attention-grabbing, client-impact-focused - **What happened:** 2-3 sentences summarizing the development - **Why it matters:** 2-3 sentences on business impact for [target_audience] - **What to do about it:** 3-4 actionable bullet points - **Key takeaway:** 1 bolded sentence ### 3. Secondary stories (2-3 stories, 80-120 words each) For each: - **Headline** - **Summary:** 2-3 sentences - **Impact:** 1-2 sentences - **Action item:** 1 bullet point ### 4. Regulatory watch (3-4 bullet points) Upcoming regulatory changes, comment periods, or effective dates relevant to [practice_area]. ### 5. Practical tip of the [frequency] (3-4 sentences) One specific, implementable recommendation drawn from the newsletter content. ### 6. CTA and firm positioning (2-3 sentences) Soft pitch for [firm_name]'s expertise with contact information for [author_name]. **Scope:** - In scope: Legal newsletter with lead story, secondary stories, regulatory watch, practical tip, and firm CTA - Out of scope: Legal advice, court filing preparation, attorney-client privileged analysis, client-specific recommendations **Constraints:** - This output is for informational and drafting assistance only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All outputs require review by a licensed attorney. [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED] - Write in plain language for [target_audience] — translate legal jargon into business language - Flag all case names, statute citations, and effective dates with [VERIFY] - Do NOT present firm commentary as established law — clearly distinguish analysis from settled legal principles - Keep total newsletter under 800 words